Optimal way of realisation of measuring object is done according to measuring schema
...........................Stilling length /m/ .................... length from Parshall flume to bend, confluence, floodgate,
.................................................................................lower outlet, overflow, etc.
...........................Length of prismatic channel /m/ .... dlength of a rectangular channel section before the Parshall
...........................................................................................flume and a transition section
...........................Length of transition section /m/ .... length of section of widening/narrowing, change of cross-
....................................................................................sectional shape e.g. from rectangular to circular and vice versa
Following three tables show illustrative examples on approximate data for stilling lengths, length of prismatic channels and for lengths of transition sections. Optimum method of construction of this measuring structure can be based on a schematic given below.
Stilling length of conduit
Conduit length after the bend, confluence etc.e |
12 x throat width
|
Conduit length behind the hydraulic jump, sluice gate, overflow structure, shaft drop, valve gate etc. |
30 x throat width
|
Length of prismatic flume
Parameter/type of flume |
P1
|
P2
|
P3
|
P4
|
P5
|
P6
|
P7
|
P8
|
P9
|
Length of prismatic flume (m) |
0,05
|
0,1
|
0,5
|
1,6
|
2,4
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
The lenth can vari according incoming hydraulic conditions table above is only aproximately value. The design of manhole hs to be made individually ( provide Pars aqua - free ).
We can send you designs of manholes for all parshall flumes.
Length of transition section
- change of flow cross-sectional shape When a transition between different conduit shapes (for instance from circular to rectangular cross section) must be constructed in order to achieve a gradual widening we require that the angle between longitudinal channel axis and wall did not exceed 100. This will prevent the creation of wakes and disturbance from uniform velocity distribution field. In case of converging of the flume, this angle is higher and its values are shown in Table 3. Narrowed flume is then directly connected with the beginning of Parshall flume.
Parameter/type of flume |
P1 |
P2 |
P3 |
P4 |
P5 |
P6 |
P7 |
P8 |
P9 |
|
angle of narrowing between Cephalo-caudal axis of flume and walls
|
maximal angle of converging |
900 |
900 |
900 |
450 |
300 |
150 |
110 |
110 |
110 |
recommended angle of converging
|
900 |
600 |
450 |
250 |
150 |
110 |
110 |
110 |
110 |
When a determination of stilling section is not correct, surface waves and non-uniform distribution of velocity field occur. It results in a decrease in accuracy because of a poor hydraulic design and false measurement of flow depth. Small surface waves cannot necessarily create a significant error in measuring and therefore their influence is necessary to verify by an independent method, e.g. using hydrometry. In case of proof of unacceptable errors in measurements, it is essential to stabilise the flow. For this purpose a variety of breakers or rectifiers can be used. If possible, rising the flume bottom can solve these problems. If inevitable, a new flume is installed.
(c) 2003, PARS Aqua, s.r.o.